🔗 Share this article

In the eyes of Natalia Molina and longtime Mexican American, the most memorable moment of the baseball championship didn't occur during the nail-biting final game on Saturday, when her squad executed multiple dramatic escape feat after another and then prevailing in extra innings against the opposing team.

It happened a game earlier, when two supporting players, the Puerto Rican player and the Venezuelan infielder, pulled off a thrilling, game-winning play that simultaneously upended many negative stereotypes touted about Latinos in recent years.

The play itself was breathtaking: the outfielder charged in from left field to snag a ball he initially misjudged in the stadium lights, then fired it to the infield to record another, decisive out. the second baseman, at second base, caught the ball moments before a opposing player barreled into him, knocking him to the ground.

This was not merely a remarkable athletic moment, possibly the key shift in the series in the Dodgers' favor after looking for much of the series like the underdog team. For Molina, it was thrilling, on multiple levels, a badly needed uplift for Latinos and for the city after months of immigration raids, security forces patrolling the streets, and a steady drumbeat of negativity from official sources.

"Kike and Miggy presented this alternative story," said Molina. "Everyone witnessed Latinos showing an infectious pride and joy in what they do, acting as leaders on the team, having a different kind of masculinity. They're energetic, they're yelling, they're taking off their shirts."

"It was such a juxtaposition with what we observe on the news – raids, Latinos thrown to the ground and chased down. It is so easy to be demoralized right now."

Not that it's exactly straightforward to be a team supporter these days – for Molina or for the legions of other fans who attend regularly to home games and occupy as many as 50% of the stadium's fifty thousand seats per game.

The Mixed Connection with the Organization

When aggressive immigration raids started in Los Angeles in early June, and national guard units were sent into the area to respond to ensuing demonstrations, two of the city's soccer teams quickly issued statements of solidarity with immigrant families – while the Dodgers.

Management has said the Dodgers prefer to steer clear of political issues – a stance colored, perhaps, by the fact that a sizable minority of the supporters, including some Hispanic fans, are supporters of current political figures. Under significant external demands, the organization subsequently pledged $one million in support for families personally affected by the raids but issued no official condemnation of the administration.

White House Visit and Historical Legacy

Three months before, the organization did not delay in accepting an invitation to mark their previous World Series win at the White House – a move that local writers described as "disappointing … weak … and contradictory", given the Dodgers' boast in having been the pioneering professional team to end the color barrier in the mid-20th century and the regular references of that history and the principles it represents by executives and present and former athletes. A number of players such as the coach had expressed unwillingness to travel to the White House during the first term but then reconsidered or succumbed to demands from the organization.

Corporate Ownership and Fan Dilemmas

A further complication for fans is that the Dodgers are owned by a large investment group, the ownership group, whose equity holdings, as per media reports and its own released financial documents, include a share in a private prison company that operates detention facilities. The group's executives has said many times that it wants to remain neutral of politics, but its critics say the inaction – and the investment – are their own type of compliance to current policies.

These factors contribute to considerable conflicted emotions among Hispanic fans in particular – feelings that emerged even in the excitement of this year's hard-fought World Series triumph and the following outpouring of team support across Los Angeles.

"Is it okay to root for the Dodgers?" area writer Erick Galindo agonized at the beginning of the playoffs in an elegant article pondering on "team loyalty in our veins, but uncertainty in our hearts". Galindo was unable to finally bring himself to watch the championship, but he still felt deeply, to the extent that he decided his personal boycott must have given the squad the fortune it required to win.

Distinguishing the Team from the Owners

Numerous fans who share Galindo's reservations seem to have decided that they can keep to support the players and its roster of international stars, including the Asian megastar a key player, while expressing disdain on the organization's business overlords. At no place was this more clear than at the championship parade at the home venue on the following day, when the packed audience cheered in support of the manager and his players but booed the team president and the top official of the investors.

"The executives in suits do not get to take our players from us," the fan said. "We've been with the Dodgers for more time than they have."

Historical Context and Community Effect

The problem, though, goes further than only the organization's present owners. The deal that moved the former franchise to the city in the late 1950s involved the municipality demolishing three low-income Hispanic neighborhoods on a hill above downtown and then transferring the property to the organization for a fraction of its actual worth. A track on a 2005 record that documents the story has an low-income worker at the venue stating that the house he lost to eviction is now a part of the field.

A prominent commentator, perhaps southern California most influential Latino writer and broadcaster, sees a more troubling side to the long, problematic dynamic between the team and its audience. He calls the Dodgers the popular snack of baseball, "a business organization with an undue, even unhealthy devotion by numerous Latinos" that has been shortchanging its supporters for decades.

"They have acted around Hispanic fans while profiting from them with the other for so much time because they have been able to avoid consequences," the writer noted over the warmer months, when demands to boycott the organization over its lack of response to the enforcement actions were upended by the awkward reality that attendance at matches did not dip, even at the peak of the protests when downtown LA was under to a evening restriction.

International Stars and Community Bonds

Separating the team from its business leadership is not a simple task, {