🔗 Share this article

Do your professional networking followers recognizing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of respondents applauding your insights on expanding your venture? Do recruiters reaching out to discuss collaborations?

If not, the explanation could be your gender.

The Test: Changing Profile Gender for Better Visibility

Numerous women joined an organized professional network test recently following viral posts indicated that switching their gender to "man" enhanced their platform visibility.

Some participants rewrote their profiles to include what they termed "bro-coded" terminology - adding action-focused professional jargon like "propel", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their visibility also improved.

Systemic Preference Questions Brought Up

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether an inherent sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm favors male users who employ professional networking terminology.

Similar to most major networking sites, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to determine which posts are shown to which members - boosting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

Through a blog post, LinkedIn recognized the trend but claimed it does not consider "personal characteristics" when determining post visibility. Rather, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" affect how posts perform.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not influence how your content shows up in search or feed.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who modified her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her profile name to "a masculine version", described extraordinary results.

"The numbers I'm seeing show a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, began experimenting after observing her reach decrease substantially.

The Method

• First, she modified her gender to "male"
• Then, she used AI tools to rewrite her professional summary using "male-coded" language
• Finally, she repurposed old posts with comparable "agentic" style

The result was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in reach within one week.

The Downside

Although the success, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the method.

"Previously, my posts were softer - brief and clever, but also warm and relatable," she stated. "Now, the masculine version was forceful and self-assured - similar to a white male swaggering around."

She discontinued the experiment after seven days, stating "Every day I continued, and results improved, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Not all testers experienced positive results. One writer who modified both her profile gender to "man" and her race to "Caucasian" reported a reduction in reach and interaction.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it functions in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These experiments occur alongside continuing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a professional network and community site.

Platform modifications in the past few months have reportedly caused women professionals experiencing markedly lower visibility, resulting in unofficial tests where the same posts by men and women received vastly different audience engagement.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to categorize and spread posts based on multiple factors, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company claims it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

Company representative proposed that recent declines in certain members' visibility might stem from higher volume due to more content on the platform.

Changing Landscape

As one participant observed, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."