🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have voted to withdraw from an global treaty designed to protect females from abuse, covering domestic abuse, following prolonged and heated debates in the parliament.

Thousands of demonstrators gathered in the capital this week to voice disagreement with the decision. The ultimate decision now lies with President Edgars Rinkevics, who must determine whether to approve or reject the proposed law.

Referred to as the European treaty, the international accord only took effect in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, requiring governments to develop laws and support services to end all types of violence.

Latvia has become the initial EU country to begin the process of withdrawing from the convention. Turkey pulled out in two years ago, a move that human rights organizations characterized as a major regression for women's rights.

Political Controversy and Opposition

The treaty was approved by the EU in last year, yet traditionalist groups have argued that its emphasis on gender equality weakens traditional families and promotes what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a thirteen-hour discussion in the Latvian parliament, MPs voted by a margin of 56-32 to exit from the treaty, a action sponsored by political opponents but backed by representatives from one of the three governing partners.

The outcome represents a defeat for centre-right government leader the nation's PM, who joined demonstrators outside parliament earlier this week. "We will not surrender, we will continue fighting so that violence will not prevail," she stated to the assembly.

Political Divisions and Reactions

One of the main parties advocating for the exit is Latvia First, whose leader has urged citizens to select from what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "gender ideology with various gender identities".

The nation's ombudswoman Karina Palkova appealed for the treaty not to be made political, while the group Equality Now stated it was "not a danger to national principles, it served as a tool to achieve them".

The Thursday's vote has provoked broad protest both within Latvia and abroad.

22,000 individuals have endorsed a national appeal calling for the treaty to be maintained. The gender equality group the rights center has announced a protest for the coming week, charging MPs of ignoring the wishes of the Latvian people.

Global Concerns and Potential Next Steps

The head of the Council of Europe's parliamentary assembly stated that Latvia had made a hasty choice driven by false information. He characterized it as an "never-before-seen and extremely worrying step backward for women's rights and human rights in Europe".

He noted that since Turkey abandoned the convention four years ago, cases of gender-based killings and violence against women had risen sharply.

Because the decision did not secure a supermajority majority, the president could possibly send back the bill for further consideration if he has objections.

President the national leader announced on social media that he would evaluate the vote according to constitutional requirements, "taking into account governmental and judicial considerations, instead of belief-based viewpoints".

Last week, another component of the ruling coalition, the Progressives, suggested it would not exclude appealing to the supreme judicial body.

"This decision represents a worrisome situation for gender equality not only in Latvia but throughout the continent," stated a rights advocate.

• Family violence rates have been rising in several EU nations
• The European treaty mandates specific legal protections for survivors of domestic abuse
• Latvia's decision could affect comparable discussions in additional EU countries