🔗 Share this article

The federal government appeared poised on Wednesday to deploy dozens of federal agents to the Bay Area region for a significant border security initiative, sparking outrage from California leaders.

Information of the Mission

Specifics of the operation were gradually becoming clear, but it will reportedly include more than 100 federal agents, according to reports. The agents are scheduled to begin utilizing the US Coast Guard base in the East Bay, across the bay from San Francisco. It was still uncertain whether national guard troops would participate.

Government Response

The deployment follows an extended period of threats by the administration to take action against the liberal city. The state's leader Gavin Newsom denounced the action, describing it as “straight from the dictator’s handbook”.

“He sends out covered agents, he sends out border agents, he deploys ICE, he creates worry and terror in the population so that he can lay claim for handling that by deploying the national guard,” Newsom said. “This mirrors the arsonist extinguishing the blaze.”

Local Planning

San Francisco is the latest metropolitan center singled out by the federal effort of large-scale detentions. The mission is likely to cause a showdown between the administration and municipal authorities who have vowed to prevent paramilitary operations in the city.

San Franciscans have been gearing up for an extended period for Trump to make good on repeated threats to send troops to the city. At a Wednesday afternoon press conference, San Francisco’s city leader reiterated that the city was equipped.

“For months, we have been anticipating the likelihood of a potential federal deployment in our city,” stated the official, noting that he had taken further executive actions on Wednesday to “bolster the city’s assistance to our foreign-born residents, and make certain our agencies are organized ahead of any federal deployment.”

Constitutional Context

Regardless of legal challenges to missions in a several municipalities, including Chicago, Portland and Southern California, Trump has asserted “complete control” to deploy the state troops in cities, pointing to the Insurrection Act which enables presidents specific authority to dispatch personnel on domestic land.

Community Reaction

Newsom, who previously served as San Francisco’s mayor – had pledged to step in “right away” to a mission in the city. “The concept that the White House can send forces into our cities with no valid reason supported by evidence, no monitoring, no answerability, no consideration of state sovereignty – it constitutes an attack on the rule of law,” he said on Wednesday.

Public associations, including civil rights groups created during the initial federal leadership, have prepped to swiftly gather a large protest in the city, as well as candlelight gatherings at public spaces.

Neighborhood Effect

In San Francisco’s Mission neighborhood, a largely Hispanic neighborhood, local representative informed journalists last week she and her constituents had been preparing for this moment. “The time that workers cease employment, when minority individuals can’t freely walk outside without the fear of national personnel targeting based on race and detaining them, the moment when students avoid classrooms, are too scared to go to the supermarket or medical provider,” she said. “What we have been preparing for in the Mission is essentially a closure the likes of which we have not experienced since the health crisis.”

Military Condition

Roughly 300 out of 4,000 regional state soldiers continue under national command under an command from Trump. Roughly several hundred of them had been sent to the Pacific Northwest, where they were staying in standby during a judicial dispute over their deployment.

This time, Newsom said he had requested the local soldiers under his authority to manage food banks during the federal closure.