🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in graves at risk from shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision over how to tackle the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a range of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer locations. Authorities say it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing looking for valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Along the coast is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His mother expressed she lost sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to think this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to handle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some want additional sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Others contend the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need good local conversations to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in life after death, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the physical loss of sacred ground.